Do the researchers clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?

Do the researchers clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation?

GUIDE TO AN OVERALL CRITIQUE OF A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH REPORT
(10-PAGE LIMIT ON THE ASSIGNMENT; STUDENTS SHOULD TYPE THE CRITIQUE AS A WORD DOCUMENT. USE THE HEADINGS IN THE COLUMN LABELED ASPECTS FO THE REPORT TO SEPARATE EACH SECTION OF YOUR CRITIQUE. USE THIS TABLE AS A GUIDE TO HELP YOU FIND THE PROPER INFORMATION TO INCLUDE IN YOUR CRITIQUE. REMEMBER YOUR PROFESSIONAL WRITING SKILLS)

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Do the researchers clinical, substantive, or methodologic qualifications and experience enhance confidence in the findings and their interpretation? completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Aspect of the Report Critiquing Questions
Title
2 pts. ? Is the title a good one, suggesting the key phenomenon and the group or community under study?
Abstract
2 pts. ? Does the abstract clearly and concisely summarize the main features of the report?
Introduction
Statement of the problem
2 pts.
? Is the problem stated unambiguously and is it easy to identify?
? Does the problem statement build a cogent and persuasive argument for the new study?
? Does the problem have significance for nursing?
? Is there a good match between the research problem on the one hand and the paradigm, tradition, and methods on the other?
Research questions
3 pts. ? Are research questions explicitly stated? If not, is their absence justified?
? Are the questions consistent with the studys philosophical basis, underlying tradition, or ideological orientation?
Literature review
2 pts. ? Does the report adequately summarize the existing body of knowledge related to the problem or phenomenon of interest?
? Does the literature review provide a sound basis for the new study?
Conceptual underpinnings
4 pts. ? Are key concepts adequately defined conceptually?
? Is the philosophical basis, underlying tradition, conceptual framework, or ideological orientation made explicit and is it appropriate for the problem?
Method
Protection of participants rights
2 pts.
? Were appropriate procedures used to safeguard the rights of study participants? Was the study subject to external review by an IRB/ethics review board?
? Was the study designed to minimize risks and maximize benefits to participants?
Research design and research tradition
4 pts. ? Is the identified research tradition (if any) congruent with the methods used to collect and analyze data?
? Was an adequate amount of time spent in the field or with study participants?
? Did the design unfold in the field, giving researchers opportunities to capitalize on early understandings?
? Was there an adequate number of contacts with study participants?
Sample and setting
4 pts. ? Was the group or population of interest adequately described? Were the setting and sample described in sufficient detail?
? Was the approach used to recruit participants or gain access to the site productive and appropriate?
? Was the best possible method of sampling used to enhance information richness and address the needs of the study?
? Was the sample size adequate? Was saturation achieved?
Data collection
5 pts. ? Were the methods of gathering data appropriate? Were data gathered through two or more methods to achieve triangulation?
? Did the researcher ask the right questions or make the right observations, and were they recorded in an appropriate fashion?
? Was a sufficient amount of data gathered? Were the data of sufficient depth and richness?
Procedures
2 pts. ? Are data collection and recording procedures adequately described and do they appear appropriate?
? Were data collected in a manner that minimized bias? Were the staff who collected data appropriately trained?
Enhancement of trustworthiness
2 pts. ? Did the researchers use effective strategies to enhance the trustworthiness/integrity of the study, and was the description of those strategies adequate?
? Were the methods used to enhance trustworthiness appropriate and sufficient?
? Did the researcher document research procedures and decision processes sufficiently that findings are auditable and confirmable?
? Is there evidence of researcher reflexivity?
? Is there thick description of the context, participants, and findings, and was it at a sufficient level to support transferability?
Data analysis
2 pts.
? Are the data management and data analysis methods sufficiently described?
? Was the data analysis strategy compatible with the research tradition and with the nature and type of data gathered?
? Did the analysis yield an appropriate product (e.g., a theory, taxonomy, thematic pattern)?
? Do the analytic procedures suggest the possibility of biases?
Results
Findings
2 pts. ? Are the findings effectively summarized, with good use of excerpts and supporting arguments?
? Do the themes adequately capture the meaning of the data? Does it appear that the researcher satisfactorily conceptualized the themes or patterns in the data?
? Does the analysis yield an insightful, provocative, authentic, and meaningful picture of the phenomenon under investigation?
Theoretical integration
2 pts. ? Are the themes or patterns logically connected to each other to form a convincing and integrated whole?
? Are figures, maps, or models used effectively to summarize conceptualizations?
? If a conceptual framework or ideological orientation guided the study, are the themes or patterns linked to it in a cogent manner?
Discussion
Interpretation of the findings
2 pts. ? Are the findings interpreted within an appropriate social or cultural context?
? Are major findings interpreted and discussed within the context of prior studies?
? Are the interpretations consistent with the studys limitations?
Implications/ recommendations
2 pts. ? Do the researchers discuss the implications of the study for clinical practice or further inquiryand are those implications reasonable and complete?

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.