Identify the members of the interdisciplinary team who will be included in the RCA and FMEA. The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response.

Identify the members of the interdisciplinary team who will be included in the RCA and FMEA. The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response.

RTT Task 2
value: 0.00 value: 1.00 value: 2.00 value: 3.00 value: 4.00 Score/Level
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, mechanics) The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. The candidate provides limited articulation of response. The candidate provides adequate articulation of response. The candidate provides substantial articulation of response.
A. Root Cause Analysis The candidate does not complete an appropriate root cause analysis that takes into consideration causative factors that led to the sentinel event. The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis, with no detail, that takes into consideration causative factors that led to the sentinel event. The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis, with limited detail, that takes into consideration causative factors that led to the sentinel event. The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis, with adequate detail, that takes into consideration causative factors that led to the sentinel event. The candidate completes an appropriate root cause analysis, with substantial detail, that takes into consideration causative factors that led to the sentinel event.
A1. Errors or Hazards The candidate does not provide a logical discussion of the errors or hazards in care in the scenario. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with no detail, of the errors or hazards in care in the scenario. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with limited detail, of the errors or hazards in care in the scenario. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with adequate detail, of the errors or hazards in care in the scenario. The candidate provides a logical discussion, with substantial detail, of the errors or hazards in care in the scenario.
B. Improvement Plan The candidate does not use change theory to develop an appropriate improvement plan to decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario. The candidate uses change theory to develop an appropriate improvement plan, with no detail, to decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario. The candidate uses change theory to develop an appropriate improvement plan, with limited detail, to decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario. The candidate uses change theory to develop an appropriate improvement plan, with adequate detail, to decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario. The candidate uses change theory to develop an appropriate improvement plan, with substantial detail, to decrease the likelihood of a reoccurrence of the outcome of the scenario.
C. FMEA The candidate does not use a failure mode and effects analysis to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail. The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with no support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail. The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with limited support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail. The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with adequate support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail. The candidate uses a failure mode and effects analysis, with substantial support, to project the likelihood that the process improvement plan suggested would not fail.
C1.
Interventions The candidate does not provide a logical explanation of how to test any interventions to improve care in a similar situation by changing the process of care. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with no support, of how to test any interventions to improve care in a similar situation by changing the process of care. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with limited support, of how to test any interventions to improve care in a similar situation by changing the process of care. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with adequate support, of how to test any interventions to improve care in a similar situation by changing the process of care. The candidate provides a logical explanation, with substantial support, of how to test any interventions to improve care in a similar situation by changing the process of care.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Identify the members of the interdisciplinary team who will be included in the RCA and FMEA. The candidate provides unsatisfactory articulation of response. The candidate provides weak articulation of response. completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.