You are asked to critically appraise the research using the Critical Review Form Version 2.0 (Letts et al 2007). Attached are the Article to be critically appraisal Guidelines and the critical review form.

You are asked to critically appraise the research using the Critical Review Form Version 2.0 (Letts et al 2007). Attached are the Article to be critically appraisal Guidelines and the critical review form.

Task 1: Critical Appraisal
Length: 1000-1200 words
Detailed description for each criterion of the Critical Review Form. Critical discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of sampling data collection and analysis. Critically discusses conclusion and implications of the reviewed study.
Task 2: Phenomenology and qualitative research
Length: 250 words
Describe the phenomenological approach to qualitative research.
Detailed description of phenomenology and detailed comparison to other qualitative approaches. Identifies research problems suitable for a phenomenological study. Identifies research problems suitable for a phenomenological study and basic description of bracketing. Identifies research problems suitable for a phenomenological study and detailed description of bracketing. I have attached the paper (Joanasson et al 2011) you are to review; the Critical Review Form and some Guidelines to help you with the task. Using the form helps you structure your review and cover the most important aspects for describing and appraising a piece of qualitative research.
You are using the critical review tool to guide YOUR evaluation of the quality of the report.
This task shouldnt require lots of references. References may be included in the relevant question box. In reviewing the paper give the paper credit where you think it is due but dont be scared to find fault if you think that some aspect of the study or the report fails to measure up (using the criteria of the CR from). Current references
If you are experiencing difficulty inserting X in to the checkboxes delete the options that are not applicable
EMPIRICAL STUDIES
Corroborating indicates nurses ethical values in a geriatric ward
LISE-LOTTE JONASSON MSc14 PER-ERIK LISS Professor2 BJO RN
WESTERLIND MD3 & CARINA BERTERO Professor4
1Department of Nursing Science School of Health Sciences University of Jonkoping Sweden 2Department of Health and
Society Linkoping University Sweden 3Department of Geriatrics County Hospital Ryhov Jonkoping Sweden and
4Department of Medical and Health Sciences Division of Nursing Science Faculty of Health Sciences Linkopings University
Sweden
Abstract
The aim of the study was to identify nurses ethical values which become apparent through their behaviour in the
interactions with older patients in caring encounters at a geriatric clinic.
Descriptions of ethics in a caring practice are a problem since they are vague compared with the four principles of
autonomy beneficence non-maleficence and justice.
A Grounded Theory methodology was used. In total 65 observations and follow-up interviews with 20 nurses were
conducted and data were analysed by constant comparative analysis.
Three categories were identified: showing consideration connecting and caring for. These categories formed
the basis of the core category: Corroborating. In corroborating the focus is on the person in need of integrity and
self-determination; that is the autonomy principle. A similar concept was earlier described in regard to confirming.
Corroborating deals more with support and interaction. It is not enough to be kind and show consideration (i.e. to benefit
someone); nurses must also connect and care for the older person (i.e. demonstrate non-maleficence) in order to
corroborate that person.
The findings of this study can improve the ethics of nursing care. There is a need for research on development of a high
standard of nursing care to corroborate the older patients in order to maintain their autonomy beneficence and nonmaleficence.
The principal of justice was not specifically identified as a visible nursing action. However all older patients
received treatment care and reception in an equivalent manner.
Key words: Ethical values geriatric wards grounded theory nursing ethics nurses behaviour
(Accepted: 8 August 2011; Published: 14 September 2011)
In a study about satisfaction (Kahn Hassan Anwar
Babar & Babar 2007) patients felt that nurses
were good at providing privacy and there were regular
vital sign check-ups. However the patients were
dissatisfied with the nurses behaviour. In other
studies satisfaction depends on the patients ability
to participate and being involved concerning their
own care (Ford Schofield & Hope 2003; Larsson
Sahlsten Segesten&Plos 2011). Different demands
on nurses by patients affected them in their work
situation and make them feel powerless in caring
(Berg Berntsson & Danielsson 2006).
Nurses are dependent on collaborative interaction
(Bischop & Scudder 1985 1996) and they should
meet patients and relate to the older patients situation.
This collaborative interaction (i.e. a caring
relationship) is expressed by Gaut (1983) as caring
for and caring about. Caring for is a one-way
relationship in which the nurse is responsible. Caring
about is a quality found in the relationship
between nurse older patient and next of kin; that
is treating them with respect and dignity. A caring
relationship is characterised by promise and
involvement (Hjelm Hartwig & Bertero 2007). In
(page number not for citation purpose)
Correspondence: Lise-Lotte Jonasson Department of Nursing Science School of Health Sciences University of Jonkoping SE-551 11 Jonkoping Sweden.
Tel: 46 36 101242. Fax: 46 36 101250. E-mail: Lise-Lotte.Jonasson@hhj.hj.se
Int J Qualitative Stud Health Well-being
#2011 L-L. Jonasson et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0
Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) permitting all non-commercial use distribution and reproduction in any medium
provided the original work is properly cited.
1
Citation: Int J Qualitative Stud Health Well-being 2011 6: 7291 DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v6i3.7291
a caring relationship the nurse must have an ethical
responsibility. Ethical responsibility depends on personal
responsibility and this responsibility cannot be
avoided ignored or transferred (Clancy & Svensson
2007).
Individual responsibility is connected with nurses
behaviour ethical values and morals and these are
important aspects that influence their actions which
in turn influence the quality of care (Schluter

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on You are asked to critically appraise the research using the Critical Review Form Version 2.0 (Letts et al 2007). Attached are the Article to be critically appraisal Guidelines and the critical review form. completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Our website has a team of professional writers who can help you write any of your homework. They will write your papers from scratch. We also have a team of editors just to make sure all papers are of HIGH QUALITY & PLAGIARISM FREE. To make an Order you only need to click Order Now and we will direct you to our Order Page at Litessays. Then fill Our Order Form with all your assignment instructions. Select your deadline and pay for your paper. You will get it few hours before your set deadline.